Concerned Citizens' Legal News

On May 13, 2009, Rev. Stone showed up for his monthly appointment with his probation officer, Kathleen Frazier.

Frazier had told Stone in previous meetings that she had been keeping up on this website and  found nothing in violation of his probation.

March 8, 2006, Stone was arrested and April 6, 2007 convicted for making a citizen’s arrest for the illegal eviction and robbery all their personal and business property.

Although the law allow private citizens to make citizen’s arrests, Stone was convicted of aggravated harassment, for making a couple of phone calls to individuals whom he had reasons to believe were involved in aiding and abetting the cover up, to inform them of  his impending citizen’s arrests.

When Stone was arrested, he was made to believe that it was because of the  faxes he sent to the landlord; who after evicting without notice or hearing on the matter, went back to the judge and obtained an injunction against Stone, to prevent him from contacting him for the retrieval of their property.

For four months Stone was locked up under maximum security with men charged with murder, rape, robbery and other high crimes, believing that he was being charged for faxing the landlord, supposedly violating the injunction he obtained.

Although the landlord had filed a complaint for the faxes, the Stone found out in June before one of  his hearings that landlord was not the state’s victim.

Stone and family were told that he harassed the landlord for faxing him documents about what the landlord had done.  At the arraignment, Stone didn’t know that his so-called crime was classified as a class four felony, which gave justification on the record for the $250,000.00 cash only bail.

Check it out, Arizona Revised Statutes classifies aggravated harassment as a class six felony.

So Stone remained in the Maricopa County Jail, until released on his own recognizance.

First, there was the plea agreement that they wanted Stone to sign to give up his and family’s right to pursue the landlord and his attorneys, government officials, including former attorney and now AZ Court of Appeals Judge Peter Swan and others.  Stone declined the guilty plea.

July 1, 2007, Stone was placed under house arrest until his trial, which was delayed until April 2008.

Since everything was set to wrongfully convict Stone, after the conviction, one of the conditions of probation was not to make any references on this website concerning the state’s victim.

Although this website is owned and operated by Stone’s wife, she was forced to comply with the court’s order for Stone to avoid prison.

The most recent probation report reveals that the Stones, both him and wife had been complying with the terms; however, on May 13, 2009, probation officer Kathleen Frazier presented Stone with a modification of  the terms of  his probation and a threat of being arrested to force him to force his wife to shut down this website.  See probation extortion document.

The urgent request to shut down this website came after the Stones posted on this website, “Admissions On behalf of Judge Murguia” and notified numerous officials.

Working on behalf of Federal Judge Murguia, Maricopa County Judge Rosa Mroz, instituted the probation modification, with a threat of an investigation by a U.S. Marshall for impersonating an officer.

These are new actors in this arena who came forth to exert their corrupt influence to instill fear in Stone of being arrested, while Frazier was telling Stone, “you have not violated your probation”.

Frazier had before her a list of names of judges.  They were insisting that Frazier force Stone to destroy the evidence of official crimes revealed on this website and prevent the Stones from setting up any future sites without first obtaining permission.

If you have taken a look at the probation document, you see that Stone did not actually sign the document, but  wrote, “I want a hearing” with his initials, which was contrary to the command that he could not contact an attorney, nor would he have a hearing.

EXTORTION ON BEHALF OF JUDGES MURGUIA AND MALAR

Case law provides that, “Wrongful use of otherwise valid official power may convert dutiful action into “extortion.” 18 U.S.C.A subsc. 1951(b)(c). U.S. v. Dozier, 672 F.2d 531, rehearing denied 677 F.2d 113, certiorari denied 103 S.Ct. 459 U.S. 943, 74 L.Ed.2d 200. — Extort 1.

Obviously this has to be extortion since as a matter of fact and law if Judge Murguia’s September 29, 2008 order was not VOID, which it is VOID, there would be no need to threaten arrest, deny the right to see an attorney or hearing,  because the Stones could be legally forced to shut-down this website for disseminating false information and would be guilty of contempt.

Criminal acts committed by Federal District Court Judge Murguia and her accomplice Bankruptcy Judge James M. Marlar in court and out of court find no lawful authority.

To continue their massive fraud and false representations of the Stones and this case, Marlar has been persistent in blocking Stone’s access to a full and fair hearing and have blatantly violated the Bankruptcy Code, as well as other mandatory statutes.

Marlar and Murguia have  falsified the records, rigged and predetermined the Stones’ cases, committed bribery, gratuities, extortion, and other crimes.

Although the wrongdoers brought this website, the exposure.com, into this particular issue, the website has been and is also a major part of this case.

Frazier was given the probation modification document with the full intent to corruptly interfere with Stone’s probation terms by extortionate means, and to continue the deprivation of the Stones’ Constitutional rights, specifically the right to due process of law.

“Courts are constituted by authority and they cannot go beyond that power delegated to them. If they act beyond that authority, and certainly in contravention of it, their judgments and orders are regarded as nullities. They are not voidable, but simply VOID, and this even prior to reversal.” Vallely v. Northern Fire & Marine Ins. Co., 254 U.S. 348, 41 S.Ct. 116 (1920). See also Old Wayne Mut. I. Assoc. v. McDonough, 204 U.S. 8, 27 S.Ct. 236 (1907); Williamson v. Berry, 8 How. 495, 540, 12 L.Ed. 1170, 1189 (1850); Rose v. Himely, 4 Cranch 241, 269, 2 L.Ed. 608, 617 (1808).